Pages

Thursday, 16 May 2024

O tempora! O mores!

It's been a long wait -- decades, he's been talking about it; since the last century -- but finally Francis Ford Coppola's Megalopolis is nearly here. I hadn't realized how much he's modelled the story on the Catiline conspiracy, which resonated with me because six or seven years ago, having had a TV project blow up because of circumstances beyond my (or anyone's) control, I was told by the network executive who commissioned it that she felt I owed her a show.

Unable to return to the original concept, the rights in which Jamie and I were in the process of recovering from a delinquent former business partner, I started developing a couple of alternatives, one of which was this:

ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE

Civilization is fragile, and finding that out can be a terrifying thing. When you discover that the laws that kept you and your loved ones safe are being burned down in a firestorm of hatred and hardline politics. When lawgivers are denounced as saboteurs, when fanatics seize power and whip up the mob with ranting and lies. When decency and compromise have fled and you can see the cracks spreading through society all around you…

Welcome to Rome in the 1st century BC.

The life of Cicero, from the Catiline conspiracy onwards, is an amazing, dramatic, twist-filled story of trust and betrayal, alliances and vendettas, triumphs and scandals, optimism and civilized values versus self-interest and the threat of political violence.

Look at that. The story should be fresh as today’s news, but those togas and laurel wreaths and mannered period speeches can make everything seem very far-off. Irrelevant. Safe.

So what we’re going to do is set the whole story in modern dress with modern dialogue. The events are the same. The people are the same – only they look and sound like modern politicians in present-day settings.

It’s a way to bring it all home, uncomfortably so, to make us really feel the gut-wrenching danger and turmoil of those times. It’s a technique we’ve seen applied to Shakespeare (think of Ralph Fiennes’s Coriolanus) but in this case we’re applying it to an original script based on real events.

We’ll stick to real Roman history whenever possible. This is supposed to be a modern I Claudius meets The West Wing, not a vaguely Roman-themed fantasy. That said, “a foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds” and (just like in I Claudius) we’re taking historical events as the basis for our drama, but we don’t have to be dictated to by them.

Cicero’s life gives us a story spine to connect all the major events in the collapse of the republic, but Mark Cicero is not the sole character. This is an ensemble drama (again, The West Wing springs to mind) that can pick up other characters and include flashbacks to earlier events. We also have the option to show earlier events (in the Social War that established the dictator Sulla, for example) in diegetic form, as newsreel footage for example. (Roughly: events of Luke Sulla’s early dictatorship will appear to take place in the mid-1970s, Serge Catiline’s execution in the 1990s, etc, with the main storyline appearing to happen right now.)

That was the basic idea. I played around with an opening scene just to get a feel. We might never have used the scene in the finished script; writing it was just part of my process. I liked the idea of a bunch of Romans talking in a sauna to start off with, so they’re wearing towels and for all the audience could tell it might be actual Ancient Rome, and it’s only at the end of the scene when the peppy business-suited assistant looks in that we see it’s all styled like modern-day.

The project never happened -- this time for reasons unconnected with deranged business associates, but simply because the show the network wanted was adventure sci-fi in a Doctor Who-meets-MCU mold, like the one we'd written before. Nowadays, after the triumph of Succession and with the possible last days of the US republic on the horizon, maybe it would be possible to go back in and repitch it. But I'm inclined to let Mr Coppola tell his version instead. He's done a few pretty good movies in his time, after all.

10 comments:

  1. It's a great concept. Fingers crossed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, though I'm a bit worried that it's part of an ever-lengthening list of (imo) great concepts that I wasn't able to get off the ground.

      Delete
  2. It reminds me a little of Kings with Ian McShane from 2009 or so. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1137462/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_3_tt_7_nm_1_q_kings

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was briefly tempted by the concept and by the always-excellent Ian McShane, but the writer of Kings was responsible for both Green Lantern and Blade Runner 2049, both crimes of unforgivable enormity in my book.

      Delete
    2. I'm not a superhero fan, but that Blade Runner movie was awful.

      Delete
    3. The more so because it had no reason to exist other than to cash in on the reputation of the real Blade Runner movie. Studios and networks can't seem to grasp (or rather don't care) when a story is complete and perfect as it is and requires no sequel.

      Delete
    4. 'Studios and networks' is an unfair formulation. 'Studios and networks and viewers' would be more accurate.

      Delete
    5. Yes indeed, and once again I resort to quoting Oscar, who commented on this 133 years ago: "The public has always, and in every age, been badly brought up. They are continually asking Art to be popular, to please their want of taste, to flatter their absurd vanity, to tell them what they have been told before, to show them what they ought to be tired of seeing, to amuse them when they feel heavy after eating too much, and to distract their thoughts when they are wearied of their own stupidity. Now Art should never try to be popular. The public should try to make itself artistic."

      Delete
  3. What a sublime quote, I feel as if I've been searching for it all my life! Can you tell me where to find it, in what work? My art history professor would have agreed heartily...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I find myself quoting it more and more often these days. It's from Wilde's essay "The Soul of Man under Socialism", which in theory I shouldn't like as Wilde takes a pro-Christian, anti-socialist line -- and those are two ideologies I don't think are on opposite sides -- but I forgive him all, for he is the Blessèd Oscar.

      Delete